On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 06:21:35PM -0400, Steve Dickson wrote: > > > On 09/29/2009 06:13 PM, Jesse Keating wrote: > > On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 17:52 -0400, Steve Dickson wrote: > >> I thought today was the dead line... > >> > >> http://www.linux-archive.org/fedora-development/372823-all-features-need-100-beta-freeze-2009-09-29-a.html > > > > I should mention that Beta is the deadline to have the code in what we > > think is the final state, baring any glaring bugs, not a point to enable > > experimental code/settings for further experimentation. > This is in the final state... its been a 18 month effort to get this > accepted by upstream... > > At the end of the day, I was just following the rules that were deemed by > that email and a number of earlier ones... I'm a bit dumbfound... I think that what we need, Steve, is some sort of information about what testing has happened up to this point that satisfies FESCo that this change the equivalent of moving the needle from 99% complete to 100% complete, as opposed to moving from 90% complete to 91% complete (with testing being the last 9%). -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
