On 09/29/2009 06:55 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote: > On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 06:21:35PM -0400, Steve Dickson wrote: >> >> >> On 09/29/2009 06:13 PM, Jesse Keating wrote: >>> On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 17:52 -0400, Steve Dickson wrote: >>>> I thought today was the dead line... >>>> >>>> http://www.linux-archive.org/fedora-development/372823-all-features-need-100-beta-freeze-2009-09-29-a.html >>> >>> I should mention that Beta is the deadline to have the code in what we >>> think is the final state, baring any glaring bugs, not a point to enable >>> experimental code/settings for further experimentation. >> This is in the final state... its been a 18 month effort to get this >> accepted by upstream... >> >> At the end of the day, I was just following the rules that were deemed by >> that email and a number of earlier ones... I'm a bit dumbfound... > > I think that what we need, Steve, is some sort of information about > what testing has happened up to this point that satisfies FESCo that > this change the equivalent of moving the needle from 99% complete to > 100% complete, as opposed to moving from 90% complete to 91% complete > (with testing being the last 9%). > Not a problem... I want to and will work closely with FESCo to make sure we know all the ins and outs of this change... believe me my slate is cleared for few weeks to be as responsive as possible for this new feature... In the end this will be a good thing... And I do apology for (unwittingly) spring this on everyone in such an unexpected way... But again, truly truly truly thought I was just following the development cycle that was laid out on the fedora-devel-announce list.. With all that said... Back to your point... What type of testing is done today on NFS and other File systems? Unfortunately I can not comment on a process I don't know about? steved. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
