John Poelstra wrote:
> The current FESCo might also want to consider taking more of a
> leadership role in monitoring the release processes, tracking the
> schedule, and evaluating the quality of the release under development
> and our ability to release on time. As the group responsible for
> guiding the technical direction of our releases I think this is
> something they should be more involved in. I'd be glad to help gather
> data they might need to do this and there might be others who would be
> willing to help too.
>
> I'm suggesting more proactive leadership from FESCo and clear
> initiatives to take Fedora to the next level versus only being
> responsible for approving features, proven packagers, and policy matters.
And when should we find the time for that? Our meetings already usually take
2 hours, and during the rest of the week, we have other things to do as
well. Being on FESCo is not a paid full-time job!
Kevin Kofler
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
