On Fri, Oct 02, 2009 at 12:53:21AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: >John Poelstra wrote: >> The current FESCo might also want to consider taking more of a >> leadership role in monitoring the release processes, tracking the >> schedule, and evaluating the quality of the release under development >> and our ability to release on time. As the group responsible for >> guiding the technical direction of our releases I think this is >> something they should be more involved in. I'd be glad to help gather >> data they might need to do this and there might be others who would be >> willing to help too. >> >> I'm suggesting more proactive leadership from FESCo and clear >> initiatives to take Fedora to the next level versus only being >> responsible for approving features, proven packagers, and policy matters. > >And when should we find the time for that? Our meetings already usually take >2 hours, and during the rest of the week, we have other things to do as How about starting now? Our last two meetings took about 20 min combined. We're through the Feature process mostly, and we're entering the part of the development cycle that people need help with, reminders for, planning, etc. I actually agree with some of what John said. I had a discussion with someone earlier today that echoed many of those sentiments. josh -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
