On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 11:05 -0500, Matthew Woehlke wrote: > For me, that's easy. I don't want updates that the packagers don't > consider "stable". It sure sounds to me like Christopher feels the same way. > > I am willing to take the latest upstream builds because the maintainer > considers them "safe". I am not willing to use rawhide because it's > considered a free-for-all. (I don't use updates-testing either, which > IMO if I slurped everything relevant from updates-testing, would be > about the same thing as using rawhide.) So if rawhide had an updates-testing like repo, you wouldn't mind using it? -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
