On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 12:30 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 12:06 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > OK, bad example, but you know what I mean. > > Yes, I do, and I think there is room for a Fedora offering that is > released frequently (every 6 months), supported for about a year, with > conservative updates to the platform. That's nearly exactly what we > have in Fedora Desktop. There is also room for a Fedora offering that > is released frequently (every 6 months), supported for about a year, > with aggressive updates to the latest and greatest for the platform. > That's nearly exactly what we have in Fedora KDE. Its kinda funny how the GNOME side is ending up on the 'conservative' side here. We are pretty agressive in pushing new stuff into each release. But we believe it is better to do that _before_ the release, not after. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
