On Wed, 2009-02-04 at 02:59 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > OK, he measured a random sample in a single setup, without providing > details of what he actually did - Without providing these details, it's > just one sample without much significance. > > He did not specify which software was running, what with this machine > during the measurement etc. > > Also: 1-2W of ca. 100W is 1-2% of the absolute value. > If the measurement device should be this > http://www.powermeterstore.com/p1206/watts_up_pro.php?p_tab=specs > which is specified to have an accuracy of > "+/- 3% (loads above 10 watts)", > then this measurement is below the accuracy of the device and not much > more but a "tendency". Yes, I think we should definitely have this kind of discussion before we change any code. Figure for each 1 line of code we need to have at least 30 messages about it. We'll be just like the folks who write code for airplanes. :) -sv -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
