Re: Why do we disable esd in libgnome?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





2009/2/4 Dan Nicholson <dbn.lists@xxxxxxxxx>
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 2:10 PM, Linus Walleij <triad@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I'm talking
>> about making an API that exists in the platform continue to work until
>> it can be removed.
>
> It can be removed now. Convert apps over to libcanberra.

You can't remove it. That would break the API, something that GNOME will not do.

Again...

Porting apps to libcanberra is the right thing to do. Convert every
single one you find. But, gnome_sound_play is in the platform until
GNOME-3.0 comes along and API can be broken. In that case, why not
have gnome_sound_play actually do something useful since it's dead
simple to do it?

Agree. I think we shouldn't force apps to use new API by disable  old API which works fine.

--
Dan

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux