Re: Why do we disable esd in libgnome?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Bastien Nocera <bnocera@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-02-02 at 07:18 -0800, Dan Nicholson wrote:
> <snip>
>> What about the possibility of rewriting gnome_sound* to use libsydney?
>> I know it's not the most exciting work available, but that would some
>> to be the correct long term fix. It's not like the libgnome API can go
>> away prior to GNOME-3.0.
>
> It's not possible to provide an ABI or API compatible replacement,
> because gnome_sound_* exports some esound specific APIs. For example,
> gnome_sound_connection_get () and gnome_sound_sample_load().
>
> So if you're going to change the semantics, the apps will need to be
> fixed. And if the applications need to be fixed, I don't see the
> difference between rewriting the few lines of code to use libcanberra
> and adapting it for a libgnome API with different semantics.

Well, it seems like you could easily just keep most of the stub/noops
for non-esd and create a canberra-specific path for
gnome_sound_play(). That would probably cover most of the apps that
just do a fire and forget gnome_sound_play(file). That would be API
compatible with the non-esd libgnome.

--
Dan

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux