Re: Why do we disable esd in libgnome?

[King InuYasha <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx>]

But when you break something as major as libgnome, steps should be taken to ease the transition. Perhaps the function could be forwarded? I'm not really much of a programmer, but I recognize that you can't just break functionality in core libraries like that and expect everyone to fix their apps up "just like that." Fowarding the function (for compatibility purposes) while deprecating it would probably be more ideal. In any case, that's just my two cents...

On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 6:42 AM, Bastien Nocera <bnocera@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Sun, 2009-02-01 at 22:31 -0500, Jens Petersen wrote:
> ----- "平天韩" <hanpingtian@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Right. How about enable esd in libgnome please?
>
> I suggest you file a bug in bugzilla if there isn't one already and see what happens.

Will probably be closed as WONTFIX. The API docs made it clear that the
libgnome sound support was a build-time option.

The application should be fixed to use more modern API.

Cheers

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list