On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 02:20 +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > Min power Default Max performance > > So a blinking cursor indicates higher performance than a non-blinking > one? You can't represent power management on a one dimensional scale. > That's poor UI. Whatever. This can be worked around. Somehow on this forum saying that "90%+ of users use Windows" is a "made up statistic" whereas saying that turning off blinking on a cursor is going to save millions of trees is self evident. Yay! Changing defaults like this is just a way to shoot ourselves in the foot. Real customers/users are very finicky about the tiniest of details. Dealing with them directly is a great learning experience. Besides, we seem to enjoy pain: nobody will appreciate a non-blinking cursor, yet we know _some_ will have a big problem with it. The only people benefiting from it is the ones doing mental calculations about trees saved. That's a tiny minority. -- Dimi Paun <dimi@xxxxxxxxxxx> Lattica, Inc. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
