Jesse Keating wrote:
On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 07:48 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Do we really need FESCo to micro manage this. FESCo has delegated this
job to rel-eng and they should able to trust rel-eng with making the
right decisions without voting on every small change in the schedule.
So you get upset when decisions are made in voice or IRC channels, so
when we try and make a decision in the open via mailing list and a
ticketing system, you say it's not necessary? Really? Can we win with
you Rahul? Is it possible?
I am not sure your goal should be "winning" with me. That's pretty
meaningless. You are trying to put together two unrelated things. The
first problem was explained by Thorsten in a blog post which you already
replied saying that we should doing it better. So that's over and we
don't need to rehash it in this current unrelated discussion.
For schedule changes, you are already communicating this via mailing
lists including the reasons for the change. I am suggesting FESCo trust
you with the decisions on this to avoid overhead for you. I don't
understand your grudges while I am trying to make it easier for you to
do your work.
Rahul
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
