Re: RFC: Disabling blinking cursor by default

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 01:29:05AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le mardi 03 février 2009 à 17:24 +0100, Tomasz Torcz a écrit :

  Uhm, sorry? The talk was of about 1-2W. Given that my Thinkpad T400
could go to 10,3W when idle
But when it's idle, you are in screensaver or blank screen with no
cursor anyway. The "wins" are massively overhyped,
Agreed.

I think it's time to demand measurement procedures such that people can reproduce this claim.

Those were already provided.
Are you referring to Felix Miata's table?

To me these read more as a joke but real defined testing scenarios.

Ralf





--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux