On Thursday, 29 January 2009 at 21:51, Robert Scheck wrote: > On Thu, 29 Jan 2009, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > > How about we require at least one co-maintainer per package and all packages > > that don't have two maintainers in, say, 6 months from now get dropped? > > With which benefit, if we remove the right to package mantainers to forbid > provenpackager commits except for some special canditates needing FESco? If > everybody can touch anything, why a co-maintainer? Well, even with provenpackagers, it's not like they will start committing left and right into other people's packages. A co-maintainer is expected to be the first person to step in when the other maintainer is unable to do his job. I'd also make it mandatory for provenpackagers to be members of at least one SIG like KDE, Server, Games etc., i.e. ones that deal with certain group of software packages so that their area of expertise is at least somewhat defined. Regards, R. -- Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org | MPlayer http://mplayerhq.hu "Faith manages." -- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations" -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
