Re: Package Review Stats for the week ending January 18th, 2009

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2009-01-29 at 00:40 +0100, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 28.01.2009, 14:48 -0800 schrieb Jesse Keating:
> > On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 23:35 +0100, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> > >  Some examples:
> > >       * Recently I updated some of the Xfce 4.6 packages. One of them
> > >         was approved without _any_ docs.
> 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477732
> also all the desktop files were installed and listed in %files twice and
> if the reviewer had tested the package he would have noticed that. Site
> note: The reviewer has been made a sponsor 2 weeks later.

He was approved as a provenpackager, not as a sponsor.

Later,
/B
-- 
Brian Pepple <bpepple@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Bpepple
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E
BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B  CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux