Re: Package Review Stats for the week ending January 18th, 2009

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am Mittwoch, den 28.01.2009, 14:21 -0800 schrieb Jesse Keating:
> On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 23:19 +0100, Robert Scheck wrote:
> > On Mon, 19 Jan 2009, Brian Pepple wrote:
> > > Review Requests: 66
> > > Merge Reviews: 10
> > > Total reviews modified: 76
> > 
> > Wow, so much reviews happened in one week. Unfortunately so much quantity,
> > but much lesser quality. Do we really need quantity high scores rather the
> > quality ones?
> > 
> > 
> > Greetings,
> >   Robert
> 
> Are there specific issues of the quality of these reviews you'd like to
> point out and share with the rest of us?

Some examples:
      * Recently I updated some of the Xfce 4.6 packages. One of them
        was approved without _any_ docs.
      * A package was approved with more then 19 missing deps on
        binaries.
      * A font package was approved although it contained another font

I'm not giving the bz # now because I don't want to point fingers. If
you are interested, contact me off-list.

Regards,
Christoph


-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux