Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Behdad Esfahbod wrote: > >> >> I'm not actively seeking giving away my packages. I'm fine with them >> as long >> as they don't demand too much time from me. But I'll just hand them >> off as >> soon as a Fedora contributor shows up and wants to make non-trivial >> changes in >> them. That's for example how I handed some of my font packages to >> Nicolas, or >> my entire ogg vorbis stack to Hans. The point being: I am no the >> bottleneck / >> problem / ... with these packages. > > One of the rule of thumb was that if you are going to be maintaining the > package in RHEL, it is better for you to be involved in the Fedora side > as well for continuity. Otherwise, you would end up inheriting a bunch > of spec files (and patches) without a complete understanding on the > history behind them which makes it difficult to work on them, later on. > Something to consider. > ....although this can lend itself to a comaintainer role as easily as ownership. (Not disagreeing, just adding a clarification). -Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
