Re: Package Review Stats for the week ending January 18th, 2009

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 29 Jan 2009, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Robert Scheck wrote:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469972 is not brilliant, too.
> 
> And in this case the bad review was from a community member and the Red Hat
> employee actually got it fixed. :-)

Ex-Red Hat employee AFAIK. But mostly the Red Hat guys are lacking massive
RPM knowledge and ignore Guidelines (How many attempts have been needed to
get e.g. gcc4x.spec renamed to gcc.spec? Libxml2 was another thing being an
example for Christophs claims, I would say).


Greetings,
  Robert

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux