2009/1/28 Brian Pepple : > On Thu, 2009-01-29 at 00:40 +0100, Christoph Wickert wrote: >> Am Mittwoch, den 28.01.2009, 14:48 -0800 schrieb Jesse Keating: >> > On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 23:35 +0100, Christoph Wickert wrote: >> > > Some examples: >> > > * Recently I updated some of the Xfce 4.6 packages. One of them >> > > was approved without _any_ docs. >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477732 >> also all the desktop files were installed and listed in %files twice and >> if the reviewer had tested the package he would have noticed that. Site >> note: The reviewer has been made a sponsor 2 weeks later. > > He was approved as a provenpackager, not as a sponsor. > I really don't want to point fingers on anyone, but how can someone who completed only 3 reviews (one of them is what you are talking about above) become a provenpackager? IMHO there is clearly a chain of people-not-doing-their-job-properly on this. I did 40+ reviews but I can't still consider myself good enough to apply for provenpackagership. I still ask for help at certain occasions. There are so many bits and pieces in doing reviews that I don't think one can possibly learn most of them in just 3 reviews. An explanation would be nice. Orcan -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
