On Thursday, 29 January 2009 at 21:21, Robert Scheck wrote: > On Thu, 29 Jan 2009, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > You need to have a valid justification for restricting access to your > > packages. > > When answering an e-mail a few minutes ago, I was thinking, why we don't > kill restrictions at all - but then without any exceptions. That would make > Package and Merge Reviews completely unnecessary. Every packager can import > what is liked and if the change/package/... doesn't work afterwards, we've > a VCS and can undo it. So why then spending times and ressources on Reviews > as we currently do? > > Another scheme, which we didn't brought up until now is the same as our > friends from kernel.org do: Let's approve every commit by multiple people > also known as packagers - without any exception. Single user commits then > should not be possible. > > I know, that this won't be taken serious, but it's a serious thought on my > side. No need to fuss around with provenpackager guidelines, package and > merge reviews and AWOL maintainers. How about we require at least one co-maintainer per package and all packages that don't have two maintainers in, say, 6 months from now get dropped? Regards, R. -- Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org | MPlayer http://mplayerhq.hu "Faith manages." -- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations" -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
