Re: Package Review Stats for the week ending January 18th, 2009

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dear all,

The P in Packaging is becoming Politics.

> On Thursday, 29 January 2009 at 21:21, Robert Scheck wrote:
>> Another scheme, which we didn't brought up until now is the same as our
>> friends from kernel.org do: Let's approve every commit by multiple people
>> also known as packagers - without any exception. Single user commits then
>> should not be possible.

On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 9:44 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski  wrote:
> How about we require at least one co-maintainer per package and all packages
> that don't have two maintainers in, say, 6 months from now get dropped?


I maintained many packages for FEL alone together doing marketing and
documentation of my packages. I send upstream feedbacks all the time.

If you are planning this, my 4 hours of work per day proved to be
useless. Then in 6 months FEL will not be a feature. Many Packagers
will be in the same situation.

Please stop making politics and find better ways to spend your time !!
Some people want to achieve something here. By the way, I can find
stuffs for you to work on if you want.

Chitlesh

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux