seth vidal wrote:
> F9 and F10 both have python 2.5 and yum 3.2.21. Pretty much all yum's
> since 3.2.18 or 3.2.19 can cope with sha256sums already. and the
> metadata format doesn't change.
>
> The only changes made to yum to deal with sha256sums was the parts of
> yum createrepo uses to make the metadata.
I think the problem is with SHA256sums in RPMs, not in metadata, so it's RPM
which needs to be fixed, not yum.
Kevin Kofler
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
