On Thu, 29 Jan 2009, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > On Thursday, 29 January 2009 at 21:51, Robert Scheck wrote: > > With which benefit, if we remove the right to package mantainers to forbid > > provenpackager commits except for some special canditates needing FESco? If > > everybody can touch anything, why a co-maintainer? > > Well, even with provenpackagers, it's not like they will start committing > left and right into other people's packages. A co-maintainer is expected > to be the first person to step in when the other maintainer is unable to > do his job. I was thinking here about to skip the maintainer/co-maintainer stuff at all. Just one big bucket having everything in without different permissings or roles. > I'd also make it mandatory for provenpackagers to be members of at least > one SIG like KDE, Server, Games etc., i.e. ones that deal with certain > group of software packages so that their area of expertise is at least > somewhat defined. Interesting idea. But to which SIG would you assign me when looking to my wiki page, my interests and which packages I'm maintaining? Or do I need to found my own SIG for that then? I don't need to be a provenpackager, but I am also playing theoretical scenarios. Greetings, Robert -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
