Re: Package Review Stats for the week ending January 18th, 2009

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 29 Jan 2009, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> This part actually isn't mentioned in the proposal -- Should people in
> provenpackagers automatically be sponsor level (as it is now)?  Or
> should we differentiate between provenpackager(users) and
> provenpackager(sponsors) as packager is now?

There has to be a difference. Sponsors are higher in the hierarchy rather
users and could cause more damage rather a user that can't sponsor. Getting
that state needs be harder to achieve then.


Greetings,
  Robert

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux