Re: Package Review Stats for the week ending January 18th, 2009

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2009-01-29 at 11:58 +0100, Christoph Wickert wrote:
>  For example I just found out that one of the people I sponsor is proven
> packager. Of course I do trust him, otherwise I would not have sponsored
> him, but I doubt that 2 packages (!) and 3 months of experience are
> enough for a proven packager.
> 
> This shows that Jesse's proposal is pretty much useless, because it is
> weaker then the previous set of rules, no matter if it was 5 or 8
> packages.

My proposal is to seed provenpackager with people who are /sponsors/.
It has absolutely nothing to do with how many packages you have.  How is
this weaker?  How would my suggested seeding lead to your people being
in provenpackager?

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux