Re: Package Review Stats for the week ending January 18th, 2009

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Christoph Wickert wrote:

> After he was sponsored the new proven packager can sponsor as many other
> "pseudo-proven" packagers as he wants, even if they are not trustworthy.
> Other sponsors have no way to prevent this, so I'm pretty sure we'll end
> up with a large number of proven packagers again pretty soon.
> 
This part actually isn't mentioned in the proposal -- Should people in
provenpackagers automatically be sponsor level (as it is now)?  Or
should we differentiate between provenpackager(users) and
provenpackager(sponsors) as packager is now?

-Toshio

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux