On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 11:33 -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > Debarshi Ray wrote: > >> However, my point was > >> that the mere existence of this software won't magically eliminate the > >> need for humans to do package reviews, > > > > Sure. After it is just a tool, but the idea is to reduce the number of > > manual steps to a review. Manually carrying out mundane things like > > verifying whether the package builds in Koji/Mock, the Source0 tag is > > sane, md5sum of upstream and packaged tarballs match, rpmlint output, > > etc. should not burden a person every time he/she does a review. > > > Note that the software needs to be clear on what is still required of > the human reviewer. for instance, Source tag has several automatable > steps but also must have a human review that the Source URL is canonical > in the first place. "Fedora Review Wizard" (or "Druid" as GNOME apparently calls them...)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
