>>>>> "DR" == Debarshi Ray <debarshi.ray@xxxxxxxxx> writes: DR> The plan is to pull all such "other automated checks" in place. Certainly, that's a good idea; I don't know how it works out in practise, but that's no reason not to try. However, my point was that the mere existence of this software won't magically eliminate the need for humans to do package reviews, and we're still not going to be able to do significant numbers of package re-reviews given our current manpower and the current rate of new package submissions unless the community attitude towards the acceptable ratio of submissions to reviews changes (or we magically acquire significant additional manpower). >> The problem is that the terribly named "ReviewOMatic" can't >> actually automatically review anything; a human is still required. DR> What is in a name? It can be changed. Well, I wasn't exactly silent about my objection when the project was first proposed and I was ignored then. I still wish that the name didn't somehow imply that the software actually reviews anything (because it doesn't); I've spent a lot of time actually reviewing packages and find the implication that software can do it instead to be more than a bit presumptive. But in any case it's just a name, and while it will continue to annoy me I'm not going to do anything foolish such as demand that it be changed. - J< -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
