>>>>> "NM" == Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: NM> Which is why a bot like ReviewOMatic would be better suited for NM> this kind of continuous testing than human reviewers As if a bot can actually review anything. Look, it isn't hard to make sure things build and to run rpmlint. We already have other automated checks, like Kevin's source URL checks. The problem is that the terribly named "ReviewOMatic" can't actually automatically review anything; a human is still required. rpmlint output specifically is useless without piles of human interpretation. Surely you don't want to be automatically mailbombed with the rpmlint output from all of your packages. That would only lead to bogus changes just to shut up equally bogus complaints, or some random syntax in comments within a specfile indicating what rpmlint complaints are expected. Does anyone actually want that? - J< -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
