On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 16:51:07 +0530, Rahul wrote:
Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
> Rahul,
>
> if my memory is not failing, some packages appeared first in ATrpms
> than if Fedora (livna/rpmfusion): xvidcap, xzgv, xv, etc. I am not
> discussing
> if these packages are useful or not. The fedora version of xzgv was
> never able
> to display the thumbnails correctly, for instance. Why? Because it has
> to be compiled with
> gcc3.
Was there a bug report filed on this? Again, when problems are in a
repository, working together to fix the problem is more of a benefit,
compared to have alternative fixed versions in a place, where majority
of end users won't benefit from it. If maintainers don't have time,
step-in and become co-maintainers and fix the problems instead.
Note I'm looking in to fixing the xzgv thumbnails issue. Why? To show that
actually reporting problems helps I guess.
Regards,
Hans
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
