Re: proposal for fedora11 feature ReviewOMatic

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le lundi 05 janvier 2009 à 12:34 -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III a écrit :
> >>>>> "NM" == Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> NM> Conversely, since guidelines change with time, and packagers have
> NM> been known to add stuff later that would never have passed review,
> NM> some sort of regular auditing of existing packages would be great.
> 
> Infinite manpower would be great, too.  Unfortunately at this point I
> think the limited amount of reviewer time is better spent dealing
> with the incoming queue, which has grown over the holidays.

Which is why a bot like ReviewOMatic would be better suited for this
kind of continuous testing than human reviewers

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux