>>>>> "NM" == Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: NM> Conversely, since guidelines change with time, and packagers have NM> been known to add stuff later that would never have passed review, NM> some sort of regular auditing of existing packages would be great. Infinite manpower would be great, too. Unfortunately at this point I think the limited amount of reviewer time is better spent dealing with the incoming queue, which has grown over the holidays. I also don't see the situation improving much as long as it is deemed acceptable to drop large numbers of packages in the queue without doing something close to a proportional number of reviews. Several of us are willing to soak up the extras but it simply isn't enough. - J< -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
