Re: proposal for fedora11 feature ReviewOMatic

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Debarshi Ray wrote:
>>  However, my point was
>> that the mere existence of this software won't magically eliminate the
>> need for humans to do package reviews,
> 
> Sure. After it is just a tool, but the idea is to reduce the number of
> manual steps to a review. Manually carrying out mundane things like
> verifying whether the package builds in Koji/Mock, the Source0 tag is
> sane, md5sum of upstream and packaged tarballs match, rpmlint output,
> etc. should not burden a person every time he/she does a review.
> 
Note that the software needs to be clear on what is still required of
the human reviewer.  for instance, Source tag has several automatable
steps but also must have a human review that the Source URL is canonical
in the first place.

-Toshio

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux