Les Mikesell <lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: [...] > This would be to catch the things that get past updates-testing but > can be fixed quickly. You'd probably have the default set to pull all > updates (which will keep a big base of users) but once you have a > machine running nicely and doing important work you'd have a setting > to make it be more conservative there. I don't think it's as nice as > repeatable updates, but it would not take much infrastructure change. That is already on hand. It's called RHEL. -- Dr. Horst H. von Brand User #22616 counter.li.org Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 2654431 Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 2654239 Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile 2340000 Fax: +56 32 2797513 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
