On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 9:33 AM, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > But, as I've mentioned before, I think you'd get much better public > participation in testing if yum could do repeatable updates. That is, I'm > only interested in testing exactly the update that I will later do on my own > more critical machine(s) and I'm not interested enough to maintain my own > mirrored repository which is currently the only way to get exactly the same > set of programs installed on 2 different machines at different times. Do you mean.... we require all the mirrors to hold all version of all updates for a release cycle? -jef -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
