On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 09:43 -0900, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 9:33 AM, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > But, as I've mentioned before, I think you'd get much better public > > participation in testing if yum could do repeatable updates. That is, I'm > > only interested in testing exactly the update that I will later do on my own > > more critical machine(s) and I'm not interested enough to maintain my own > > mirrored repository which is currently the only way to get exactly the same > > set of programs installed on 2 different machines at different times. > > Do you mean.... we require all the mirrors to hold all version of all > updates for a release cycle? Yes, that's the only sane way to do it. yum-debug-dump / yum-debug-restore will somewhat do the above, if the repo. has the old versions available. However Fedora only has the latest, so the only real alternative is creating a new repo. of somekind ... at which point you might as well just do a local mirror. -- James Antill <james@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
