On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 8:43 AM, Colin Walters <walters@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I think the simplest would have requiring pushes direct to stable for > core packages (defining "core" as "anything installed by default on > the Desktop or Service livecd images") need some sort of signoff, > possibly from multiple people. Did you really have to use the word "core"? I think everything on the Desktop live image is probably way too broad. Does all Desktop Live functionality need to be protected? Or do we need to safeguard package updating functionality specifically? -jef -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
