Les Mikesell <lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: [...] > But I wouldn't envision marking an update as 'bad' although that's an > interesting concept itself. I was thinking that there would be a > specified time when all normal updates enter the repository, followed > by a time when only critical bug and security fix updates could be > added, so towards the end of that interval, packages that hadn't been > replaced with 'better' updates would automatically be assumed 'good' > and it would be fairly safe to update machines where you want less > risk. Then a new cycle of 'new feature' updates could start. And presumably you (and everybody else) would wait out the "until known good" period; and as nobody tried it before, get to keep the pieces of the resulting breakage... -- Dr. Horst H. von Brand User #22616 counter.li.org Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 2654431 Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 2654239 Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile 2340000 Fax: +56 32 2797513 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
