Re: starting Fedora Server SIG

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeremy Katz wrote:
On Fri, 2008-11-14 at 17:23 -0500, Seth Vidal wrote:
If the task is:
[snip]
Then everything else is unnecessary to have running.

If the task is to deal with complicated dhcp and wireless configurations, multiple and complicated vpn configurations and notify the console/desktop user about all of these things (which a lot of laptops fall into that category) then NM is extremely useful and I'd argue necessary for a convenient computing experience.

But there's a cost to maintaining two systems that are entirely
divergent and with little sharing/modularity.  I don't see the value of
"don't run a daemon" as outweighing the cost of "keep another system
maintained".

So... have an 'exit after initial configuration' option for NM?
/me runs and hides now

--
Matthew
Please do not quote my e-mail address unobfuscated in message bodies.
--
Person A: It's an ISO standard.
Person B: ...And that means what?
  -- mal (http://theangryadmin.blogspot.com/2008/04/future.html)

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux