Once upon a time, Jeremy Katz <katzj@xxxxxxxxxx> said: > On Thu, 2008-11-13 at 17:13 +0100, Dan Horák wrote: > > Chris Adams pÃÅ¡e v Ä?t 13. 11. 2008 v 10:02 -0600: > > > Once upon a time, Dan Williams <dcbw@xxxxxxxxxx> said: > > > > You can certainly disable NetworkManager and use manual configuration of > > > > your network devices. > > > > > > For how long? I thought I'd read that the plan was to use NM for > > > everything and eliminate /etc/init.d/network. > > > > We will keep/maintain /etc/init.d/network forever :-) They don't > > conflict, so there is no reason to completely drop the old method. > > Sure there is. Having multiple methods means more things that have to > be tested, more things that have to be updated for system changes, etc. That gets back to my previous question: why would I want one or more daemons required for a static server configuration? That is just more things to break. We already have udev, dbus, hald, and console-kit (I have an F9 firewall where something starts console-kit; I don't know what or why) for example, without any good docs about which can be disabled and when; please don't add NM. -- Chris Adams <cmadams@xxxxxxxxxx> Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
