On Wed, 2008-11-12 at 17:46 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote: > What does that mean for distributions that don't use RPM? rpm is part of lsb requirements is it not? > > >> If it does, I don't see much advantage over having to build in every > >> distribution,version environment in the first place. And if not, then > >> how is it supposed to know about the dependencies you mentioned. > > > > The LSB specifies an lsb_release program that you can use to determine > > how LSB compliant the box is : > > > > [manu@orient ~]$ /usr/bin/lsb_release > > LSB Version: :core-3.1-ia32:core-3.1-noarch:graphics-3.1-ia32:graphics-3.1-noarch > > Gak.. something that specifies locations by purpose wants an information > file in /usr/bin? it's not a text file, it's an application that will check your level of lsb. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
