Re: starting Fedora Server SIG

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Nicolas Mailhot (nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx) said: 
> > and it is less right, X is brought in, and also qt qt-X11. Should
> > certainly be investigated.
> 
> That's probably because of LSB compliance. As has been discussed
> previously, someone needs to split the lsb package in server-side
> stuff and other stuff (yes that would mean a system that used only the
> first part would not be fully lsb compliant)

Alternatively... make it optional? Is LSB conformance required
for a minimal install?

Bill

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux