Bill Nottingham píše v St 12. 11. 2008 v 12:08 -0500: > Nicolas Mailhot (nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx) said: > > > and it is less right, X is brought in, and also qt qt-X11. Should > > > certainly be investigated. > > > > That's probably because of LSB compliance. As has been discussed > > previously, someone needs to split the lsb package in server-side > > stuff and other stuff (yes that would mean a system that used only the > > first part would not be fully lsb compliant) > > Alternatively... make it optional? Is LSB conformance required > for a minimal install? IMHO LSB Core conformance should be required in minimal install Dan -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
