On Wed, 12 Nov 2008, Dan Horák wrote:
Bill Nottingham píše v St 12. 11. 2008 v 12:08 -0500:
Nicolas Mailhot (nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx) said:
and it is less right, X is brought in, and also qt qt-X11. Should
certainly be investigated.
That's probably because of LSB compliance. As has been discussed
previously, someone needs to split the lsb package in server-side
stuff and other stuff (yes that would mean a system that used only the
first part would not be fully lsb compliant)
Alternatively... make it optional? Is LSB conformance required
for a minimal install?
IMHO LSB Core conformance should be required in minimal install
Why? LSB compliance should be an OPTION you can choose to have but it
doesn't need to be there for a system work very well.
-sv
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
