Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
* Les Mikesell [12/11/2008 23:07] :
Does the LSB demand that program be encapsulated in
distribution,version-specific packages before it can work?
LSB requires an application to either be packaged as an RPM or supply an
installer which is itself LSB conforming.
What does that mean for distributions that don't use RPM?
If it does, I don't see much advantage over having to build in every
distribution,version environment in the first place. And if not, then
how is it supposed to know about the dependencies you mentioned.
The LSB specifies an lsb_release program that you can use to determine
how LSB compliant the box is :
[manu@orient ~]$ /usr/bin/lsb_release
LSB Version: :core-3.1-ia32:core-3.1-noarch:graphics-3.1-ia32:graphics-3.1-noarch
Gak.. something that specifies locations by purpose wants an information
file in /usr/bin?
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
