On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 12:19:16 +0100, Kalev Lember wrote: > Good. That would make it all much easier from the users point of view, I > think. > > Kalev > > On 03/21/2018 12:10 PM, Christian Fredrik Schaller wrote: > > I am not sure the whole disabled state makes any sense anymore even in > > RPM. That was something that was decided we do when the idea was to > > ship the repos by default, but disabled. Now that the 3rd party repos > > are installed only once you enable 3rd party software I would say we > > could drop the whole disabled setup as it is redundant. > > I'm not so sure. Why is it redundant? With the third party repositories set up at the moment, you're saying "These are repositories that you can use if you want to. Please review them and enable ones you'd use." So, there's that decision for the user to make, which gives the user time to review what these repositories are. Enabling them by default takes this away from them. I think disabled by default makes sense, especially in the case of repositories that provide proprietary software. -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ desktop mailing list -- desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to desktop-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
