On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 10:58:22 +0100, Kalev Lember wrote: > <snip> > Sure, suggestions for better wording are very welcome. This is the best > we've managed to come up with so far. Could the software sources can be divided into a few categories maybe? For example: - Fedora defaults "These are default Fedora repositories. Keep them enabled to get the latest updates from Fedora" - Extra Free/Open source software for Fedora Workstation "These are extra repositories for Fedora Workstation users that provide Free/Open source software from other sources, such as COPRs" - Extra Proprietary software for Fedora Workstation "These are extra repositories for Fedora Workstation users that provide proprietary software that is not free/open source" - Other repositories "These are other repositories that have been configured, such as user-enabled repositories" Maybe there could be a colour scheme too to signify each category's status, like Blue for Fedora repositories, Green for Workstation-free, Red for Workstation-nonfree, and a Yellow for user-enabled ones. How does that sound? I don't know how much work it'll take, of course. > <snip> > Yes. I believe mattdm wanted to have a new docs.fedoraproject.org page > with end-user facing text that we can link to from gnome-software. Great. Thank you for following this up. :) -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ desktop mailing list -- desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to desktop-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
