I think that would make sense. Christian, what are the requirements here? Do we have to ship the flatpak repositories in a disabled state, similar to the rpm repositories where they are enabled=0? -- Kalev On 03/20/2018 04:02 PM, Christian Fredrik Schaller wrote: > Couldn't we use the same RPM for the flatpak repositories then? > > On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 10:33 AM, Kalev Lember <kalevlember@xxxxxxxxx > <mailto:kalevlember@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: > > On 03/20/2018 03:03 PM, Christian Fredrik Schaller wrote: > > I would recommend people to go over the requirements and work with 3rd > > parties to propose further applications to include. We accept package > > proposals that are either in RPM or Flatpak format. > > I don't think we have a mechanism to add third party flatpak repos right > now. We have fedora-workstation-repositories package for shipping rpm > .repo files (and support for it in gnome-software), but nothing > equivalent for flatpak remotes. > > -- > Kalev > _______________________________________________ > desktop mailing list -- desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > <mailto:desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > To unsubscribe send an email to > desktop-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > <mailto:desktop-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > _______________________________________________ > desktop mailing list -- desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe send an email to desktop-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > _______________________________________________ desktop mailing list -- desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to desktop-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
