Re: 3rd Party software submission

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



I think that would make sense. Christian, what are the requirements
here? Do we have to ship the flatpak repositories in a disabled state,
similar to the rpm repositories where they are enabled=0?

-- 
Kalev

On 03/20/2018 04:02 PM, Christian Fredrik Schaller wrote:
> Couldn't we use the same RPM for the flatpak repositories  then?
> 
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 10:33 AM, Kalev Lember <kalevlember@xxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:kalevlember@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> 
>     On 03/20/2018 03:03 PM, Christian Fredrik Schaller wrote:
>     > I would recommend people to go over the requirements and work with 3rd
>     > parties to propose further applications to include. We accept package
>     > proposals that are either in RPM or Flatpak format.
> 
>     I don't think we have a mechanism to add third party flatpak repos right
>     now. We have fedora-workstation-repositories package for shipping rpm
>     .repo files (and support for it in gnome-software), but nothing
>     equivalent for flatpak remotes.
> 
>     --
>     Kalev
>     _______________________________________________
>     desktop mailing list -- desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>     <mailto:desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>     To unsubscribe send an email to
>     desktop-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>     <mailto:desktop-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> desktop mailing list -- desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe send an email to desktop-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
_______________________________________________
desktop mailing list -- desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to desktop-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora KDE]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux