----- Original Message ----- > On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 8:51 AM, Bastien Nocera <bnocera@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > If you know of branding uses that aren't in this list: > > https://wiki.gnome.org/Design/OS/DownstreamBranding > > please add them there. > > I see three possible recommend states, but none of the items in the > list have such a flag set. None of them have been reviewed yet, because no designer wants to touch the subject. The content of this thread is why. > Anyway, I don't see how either "boot loader" or "boot splash" theming > are related to GNOME. Plymouth is unrelated to the DE. GNOME owns the experience though. Once you boot into Fedora Workstation, GNOME controls most of the hardware and software pieces on your machine, whether directly or indirectly. This is mentioned in GNOME 3's design documents as well: "Take responsibility for the user's experience" https://www.gnome.org/~mccann/shell/design/GNOME_Shell-20091114.pdf But the discussion isn't about whether to replace GNOME branding by Fedora branding, but how to use different kinds of branding to reach the goals we set out (which we didn't explicitly yet, and that might be part of the problem). > Since either such theme could give the strong perception that what's > being booted is an official Fedora product/edition, maybe it needs a > FESCo or Council policy for what Fedora deliverables do and do not get > these theming? But I don't see how either theme method or it's look at > feel, have any bearing on GNOME or KDE or whatever. _______________________________________________ desktop mailing list -- desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to desktop-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
