Re: Fedora Workstation and why the presentation of third-party packages in Software matters

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 15/02/17 09:03 AM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>
> If it doesn't show *applications* with valid appstream metadata
> provided by the third-party repo, then it's a bug that needs to be
> fixed. AFAIK RPMFusion does not provide such metadata. Am I incorrect?
>
>
RPMFusion provides appstream data for a while although some applications
lack metadata.

rpmfusion-free-appstream-data.noarch        25-3.fc25        
@rpmfusion-free  
rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data.noarch     25-3.fc25        
@rpmfusion-nonfree


-- 
Luya Tshimbalanga
Graphic & Web Designer
E: luya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
W: http://www.coolest-storm.net
_______________________________________________
desktop mailing list -- desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to desktop-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora KDE]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux